So
where do we go from here?
From here to here.
It’s all the same moment, already perishing and yet
never-ending, already shattered and yet still whole, ever
inviting us to step out of our minds and into what we never
left but dreamt we did. Now, and ever now. A dance we know
by heart, even as we play wallflower or get engaged to our
crutches.
To know without thinking, to see without eyes, to fly without
wings, to die without leaving, to love without expecting
-- such are the primordial yet everfresh chords weaving
through our living chambers, perhaps muted, perhaps unheard,
but nevertheless still here, like wildblue sky behind a
sea of clouds.
Everything is the dancefloor.
But we may not yet have the legs nor the ripeness for it,
or at least for certain zones or levels of it. More quality
time in spiritual bootcamp’s obstacle courses may
be needed. If we’re not ready for a particular step
but assume that we should be, self-castigation may arise,
nailing us with guilt implants. Better to learn to recognize
what we actually are ready for, and to not hold ourselves
back from or above it, just because we think it’s
not sufficiently spiritual or befitting for us.
Fixating on or trying to go toward “the Light”
-- an ascent that’s generally more ass than sense
-- may only further endarken us, estranging us from that
in us which is subterranean, malignant, wretched, or otherwise
unwanted. What we won’t dance with, what we refuse
intimacy with, what we’re so ambitious to shed, is
precisely the dance-partner we need (or at least need to
approach), drawing out of us the very aversion, tension,
and pain that’s crying for illumination and love.
Take loneliness (which usually gets left all alone on the
dancefloor): Become more sensitive to it, noticing its desperation,
its craving for release from itself, its commitment to and
investment in playing wallflower. Notice its pull to get
away from those sensations that characterize it. Fleeing,
feeding, filling, emptying, sexing -- anything to provide
some relief. But what if we were to just sit there, sit
with our loneliness, not doing a damn thing other than give
it our undivided attention? We might then see that in our
loneliness -- and especially in our dramatization of it
-- we are closed off to what we really ache for: love.
And we might also see that our loneliness is a frightened,
neglected child that has grown accustomed to being treated
as a problem. A painfully troubled softness that we harden
and distort by treating as an inconvenience. The more it
cries, the more we push it away. The more it contracts,
the more we isolate it. But instead we could turn off the
TV and sit with our loneliness, letting it settle and rest
in our lap, listening to it with an opening heart and curious
mind, noticing its shape and breath, its bodily terminals,
its tones, its textures, its shifts.
And shift it does, as we continue to give it undivided,
compassionate attention, slowly perhaps, but surely, like
an abused child entering the steady, well-grounded presence
of genuine love and kindness. We can thus hold our loneliness
and let it melt in warm-armed embrace, holding it close
but not so close that it cannot breathe freely. Letting
go of our desire to be elsewhere, we let our loneliness
pervade us. Consciously. Letting the desperation go, letting
the compulsion to seek go, letting the ambition to let go
-- a spiritual “should” that’s so easy
to should-er -- also go.
Then our loneliness is not a rejected child, a loser, a
misfit, a bog of neediness, but rather a vulnerable fullness
warming us, a tender ticket to our depths, a far from dysfunctional
catalyst for remembering What-Really-Matters.
And so we sit, our loneliness transmuting into aloneness
-- we may still be physically alone, but we are nonetheless
palpably connected, especially at the heart, with so many
others. Alone we are then, alone enough to be vividly and
impactfully together with the raw Wonder of Life, and yet
also together enough to appreciate and savor our solitude,
realizing that only when we are truly capable of enjoying
being alone are we capable of really being in relationship.
We could do worse than to date our loneliness.
The unwanted in us need not be put behind the driving wheel,
but only within reach of our heart. The unwanted in us need
not be swallowed whole, but rather only liberated from whatever’s
nonbeneficial or obsolete about its viewpoint, without necessarily
robbing it of its passion, its vitality, its basic presence,
until it’s no longer an “it,” but only
reclaimed us.
We need not empty ourselves of our undesired elements; we
need not eroticize ourselves into a position where we can
or “have to” sexually discharge the sensations
of our desperation; we need not colonize our dread with
lesser fears; we need not convert our rage into aggression,
nor our helplessness into depression, nor our shame into
guilt. Our darkness asks not to be kept in the shadows,
nor to be given mere licence, but to be met face to face,
belly to belly, in a manner as vital as it is wakeful.
Full-blooded contact.
The distance between us and our suffering is the distance
between us and God. A gap made of and populated by fear.
The above doesn’t mean, however, that we should just
jump into our suffering. What is called for, at least initially,
is to take a closer look at our relationship -- and attachment
-- to our suffering. At first, we may simply be committed,
however unconsciously, to distracting ourselves from our
suffering (or the feeling of our suffering), attaching or
addicting ourselves to whatever most potently or pleasurably
distracts us. Seeing this with unclouded eyes gets us started.
Our condition may remain the same for a while -- and it
may well need to, according to our degree of ripeness --
but our commitment to it is, however slightly, undermined.
Our struggle may then deepen -- as we observe ourselves
trying to get away from our suffering, we begin to realize
that such efforts only reinforce and amplify it. Our suffering
intensifies until we find a superior distraction or a more
powerful numbing agent, or until we shift from avoiding
our suffering to deliberately facing it. Deliberately.
This is where healing begins.
When we no longer ostracize or condemn our suffering, but
invite it onto the dancefloor with us, we are on track,
however stumbling or sloppy our steps may be. Then we are
relating to our suffering; we are apart from yet not cut
off from it. Then it’s no longer just another unpretty
face, but something we can communicate with, touch, penetrate,
gaze into, bring closer.
As we move onto the dancefloor with our suffering, we begin
to recognize in it many fractured or distorted countenances,
the long-ago yet nonetheless still present faces of our
distressed or injured selves. As our heart breaks -- that
is, breaks free of its “protective” encasing
-- the faces are no longer broken, no longer held in poisonously
framed cameo.
However slightly, we are now broken enough to be whole
(and empty enough to be open), making more and more room
in ourselves for our pain. And, eventually, others’
pain. The dance continues, and we notice we are stumbling
less, and that an appealing warmth is slowly arising. A
quiet happiness suffused with a growing ease, softly pulsing
and so, so spacious. So much room, so much love. And such
rich intimations of a love beyond love. Dancing with our
suffering allows a sobering joy to bloom. Flowers of love,
flowers of disappointment, flowers of death, flowers of
no-big-deal arrival. Compassion, and a deeper compassion.
But sometimes it’s hell.
Sometimes the suffering is just too much. The key at such
times is not to force yourself onto the dancefloor (and
nor to deny yourself pain relief), but to simply keep a
spark of faith alive, the faith not only that this too will
pass, but also that the dance you have begun will continue.
Doubt your doubt. And remember not only that Life outlives
you, but that you are Life. And more. When you first experience
keeping your heart open in hell, know that it will happen
again. Don’t worry about when.
And also know that every time you deliberately dance with
your suffering you are, bit by bit, breathing strength and
dignity and integrity into your capacity to bear the unbearable.
Hell can be grace, too. In fact, when we’re in hell
and we don’t forget God, then we’re not in hell.
Real joy is not an alternative to suffering, but rather
the full flowering of our unconditional acceptance of suffering
-- which renders our suffering so transparent to Being that
we begin to realize, right down to our toes, that maybe
it’s really true that there is only God.
Such acceptance is an act not of submission, but of surrender.
In submission we collapse our boundaries; in surrender we
expand them.
In submission, we deaden ourselves; in surrender, we die
into a deeper Life. In surrender we may lose face, but we
do not lose touch. Submission flattens the ego; surrender
outdances it.
Surrender is the unarmored heart enlarged through radical
acceptance of its aching, its longing, its naked yearning,
its Homesickness. Submission is passive, but surrender is
dynamic. Submission shrinks us, but surrender, sooner or
later, makes us the right size for What-Really-Matters.
One size fits all.
Stretching for God. Stretching until we birth a deeper self,
stretching until inside and outside are lovers, stretching
until there’s no self to birth. Stretching beyond
imagination, all stretchmarks left in the dust. Stretching
a little bit here, a little bit there, stretching beyond
any need for applause, no longer reducing God to Santa Claus.
Letting our suffering stretch us, extend us, show us where
we are refusing to look, or are only looking superficially.
Appreciating the chance to investigate where we’re
being hooked. Appreciating how it all works.
We don’t graduate until we’ve learned the lessons
by heart. Otherwise, we wouldn’t sufficiently appreciate
God, wouldn’t be sufficiently prepared for realizing
who and what we actually are. We get only the very best
schooling, each of us with our own unique curriculum. Be
careful not to dismiss this as mere metaphor; it is, and
it is also something more.
If we won’t dance with our suffering and the pain
around which it is constellated, then we are likely to become
enslaved to the search to end it, to somehow be rid of its
symptoms, to so thoroughly distract ourselves from it that
it seems to no longer exist to any significantly troublesome
degree.
But being relieved of the sensations of our suffering no
more frees us than does masturbation. All our pain, all
our hurt, all our woundedness in its primary form exists,
in part, to alert us to our condition, to remind us of what
we are actually up to, to clarify the dramatics in which
we are encapsulated.
Suffering can both obstruct and catalyze our needed purification.
It all depends on how we use it. We perhaps best ripen in
the presence of awakened, unconditioned love; our suffering,
if well used, makes more of us available to that presence.
We just have to get out on the damned dancefloor with whatever
potential partners are eyeing us from the places where we’d
rather not look. Especially those who keep showing up day
after day, night after night, their presence snaring our
attention, reeling in our “I.” Forget your breath
mints and your allegiance to your distancing strategies
-- go to these partners, strike up a conversation, get them
out on the floor, invite them closer.
Do what is needed to continue the dance, including pausing.
At times effort is called for, and at other times effortlessness
needs to take the floor. Sometimes we dance, sometimes we
are danced, sometimes we get stuck, freezing in our own
headlights, and other times we flow, converting frozen yesterday
into fluid now. As we move from the periphery to the heartland
of our pain, we start to encounter what exists both prior
to and beyond all our suffering. And again it is so obvious
that God is not elsewhere, that God is not an alternative
reality.
Everything is the dancefloor.
Everything that seems to be other than us -- whether outer
or inner -- is our dance-partner, asking for more than just
tolerance. So we pick this one or that one, but do we remember
also to look for and dance with our preference-making capacity?
And do we inquire into who -- or what -- is doing the choosing?
We’ll explore these questions shortly, but for now
let’s close this chapter by returning once more to
the dancefloor, turning the spotlight on an unpopular, particularly
common yet uncommonly rewarding partner -- disappointment.